This guide helps you understand and choose between two key AWS video services while identifying which INPUT to use:
AWS Elemental MediaLive and AWS Elemental MediaConnect Service Comparison Guide
Service Definitions
AWS Elemental MediaLive is a broadcast-grade live video processing service that enables you to create high-quality video streams for delivery to broadcast televisions and internet-connected devices. It can be deployed both in the cloud and on-premises (via MediaLive Anywhere).
AWS Elemental MediaConnect is a reliable, secure transport service for live video that enables you to ingest and distribute live video between applications or services with high quality and minimal latency.
Key Differences
-
Primary Purpose
- AWS Elemental MediaLive: Video processing, encoding, and transcoding
- AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Secure and reliable video transport
-
Processing Capabilities
- AWS Elemental MediaLive: Full video processing (encoding, packaging, graphics insertion)
- AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Transport only (maintains original quality)
-
Deployment Options
- AWS Elemental MediaLive: Cloud and on-premises (via MediaLive Anywhere)
- AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Cloud-based service
Deployment Options
AWS Elemental MediaLive
- Standard cloud-based deployment
- Full access to all MediaLive features
- Suitable for most streaming workflows
AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere
- Runs on on-premises hardware in your data center
- Supports standard MediaLive inputs
- Enables local processing of SDI and other on-premises inputs
- Ideal for hybrid cloud architectures
Protocol and Input Comparison
Service | Protocol | Latency | Quality | Network Requirements | Common Use Case |
---|
AWS Elemental MediaLive (Cloud) | RTP Push | Low | High | Stable, dedicated | Broadcast contribution |
| RTMP Push | Low | Good | Standard internet | Live streaming events |
| RTMP Pull | Medium | Good | Standard internet | Social media ingestion |
| HLS Pull | High | Variable | HTTP or HTTPS Server | Web content ingestion |
| SRT Caller | Low | High | Variable internet | Remote production |
| AWS CDI | Very Low | Highest | AWS Internal | Professional cloud production |
| MP4 | N/A | Original | HTTP or HTTPS Server / Amazon S3 | VOD integration |
| TS | N/A | High | Amazon S3 | Professional content delivery |
| Elemental Link | Low | High | Standard internet | Remote contribution |
| MediaConnect | Low | Original | AWS Network | Cloud Distribution |
AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere | Standard MediaLive Inputs | Same as Cloud | Same as Cloud | Local Network | On-premises processing |
| SDI | Lowest | Highest | Direct connection | Local SDI sources |
AWS Elemental MediaConnect | ZIXI push | Ultra-low | Original | Internet optimized | Global content distribution |
| RTP | low | Original | Variable internet | Inter-facility transport |
| RTP-FEC | low | Original | Variable internet | Inter-facility transport with FEC |
| SRT Listener | Ultra-low | Original | Variable internet | Receiving content from external encoders |
| SRT Caller | Ultra-low | Original | Variable internet | Pulling content from external sources |
| RIST | Ultra-low | Original | Variable internet | Pulling content from external sources |
| Elemental Link | Low | Original | Standard internet | Remote production |
When to Use Which Service
Choose AWS Elemental MediaLive When:
- You need to encode or transcode live video
- You require multiple output formats
- You want to add graphics or captions
- You need adaptive bitrate streaming
- You're processing on-premises sources (MediaLive Anywhere)
Choose AWS Elemental MediaConnect When:
- You need reliable video transport
- You want to distribute live feeds globally
- You require ultra-low latency
- You need to maintain original quality
- You're sharing feeds between AWS accounts
Integration Scenarios
Common Workflow Examples:
-
End-to-End Cloud Processing
- Source → AWS Elemental MediaLive (processing) → Distribution
- Source → AWS Elemental MediaConnect (transport) → AWS Elemental MediaLive (processing) → Distribution
-
Hybrid On-Premises/Cloud
- Local Source → AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere (local processing) → Cloud Distribution
-
Global Distribution
- Source → AWS Elemental MediaConnect (transport) → Multiple Regions → AWS Elemental MediaLive (regional processing)
Cost Considerations
- AWS Elemental MediaLive: Charged per channel-hour
- AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Charged per output-hour and data transfer
- AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere: Additional considerations for on-premises hardware
Latency Reference
- Ultra-low: < 1 second
- Very Low: 1-2 seconds
- Low: 2-4 seconds
- Medium: 4-8 seconds
- High: 8+ seconds
Conclusion
The choice between AWS Elemental MediaLive and AWS Elemental MediaConnect depends on your specific needs:
- Use AWS Elemental MediaLive for video processing and encoding requirements
- Use AWS Elemental MediaConnect for reliable video transport
- Consider AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere for on-premises processing needs
- Both services can be used together for comprehensive workflows
For optimal results, evaluate your specific requirements for:
- Processing needs
- Quality requirements
- Latency tolerance
- Network conditions
- Deployment location preferences
Reference URLs:
AWS Elemental MediaLive:
AWS Elemental MediaConnect:
Additional Resources
This guide serves as a decision-making tool for implementing the right combination of AWS Elemental services and input protocols for your specific video workflow needs.