AWS Elemental MediaLive and AWS Elemental MediaConnect Service Comparison Guide ( FOCUS on upstream INPUT)

5 minute read
Content level: Foundational
1

This guide helps you understand and choose between two key AWS video services while identifying which INPUT to use:

AWS Elemental MediaLive and AWS Elemental MediaConnect Service Comparison Guide

Service Definitions

AWS Elemental MediaLive is a broadcast-grade live video processing service that enables you to create high-quality video streams for delivery to broadcast televisions and internet-connected devices. It can be deployed both in the cloud and on-premises (via MediaLive Anywhere).

AWS Elemental MediaConnect is a reliable, secure transport service for live video that enables you to ingest and distribute live video between applications or services with high quality and minimal latency.

Key Differences

  1. Primary Purpose

    • AWS Elemental MediaLive: Video processing, encoding, and transcoding
    • AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Secure and reliable video transport
  2. Processing Capabilities

    • AWS Elemental MediaLive: Full video processing (encoding, packaging, graphics insertion)
    • AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Transport only (maintains original quality)
  3. Deployment Options

    • AWS Elemental MediaLive: Cloud and on-premises (via MediaLive Anywhere)
    • AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Cloud-based service

Deployment Options

AWS Elemental MediaLive

  • Standard cloud-based deployment
  • Full access to all MediaLive features
  • Suitable for most streaming workflows

AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere

  • Runs on on-premises hardware in your data center
  • Supports standard MediaLive inputs
  • Enables local processing of SDI and other on-premises inputs
  • Ideal for hybrid cloud architectures

Protocol and Input Comparison

ServiceProtocolLatencyQualityNetwork RequirementsCommon Use Case
AWS Elemental MediaLive (Cloud)RTP PushLowHighStable, dedicatedBroadcast contribution
RTMP PushLowGoodStandard internetLive streaming events
RTMP PullMediumGoodStandard internetSocial media ingestion
HLS PullHighVariableHTTP or HTTPS ServerWeb content ingestion
SRT CallerLowHighVariable internetRemote production
AWS CDIVery LowHighestAWS InternalProfessional cloud production
MP4N/AOriginalHTTP or HTTPS Server / Amazon S3VOD integration
TSN/AHighAmazon S3Professional content delivery
Elemental LinkLowHighStandard internetRemote contribution
MediaConnectLowOriginalAWS NetworkCloud Distribution
AWS Elemental MediaLive AnywhereStandard MediaLive InputsSame as CloudSame as CloudLocal NetworkOn-premises processing
SDILowestHighestDirect connectionLocal SDI sources
AWS Elemental MediaConnectZIXI pushUltra-lowOriginalInternet optimizedGlobal content distribution
RTPlowOriginalVariable internetInter-facility transport
RTP-FEClowOriginalVariable internetInter-facility transport with FEC
SRT ListenerUltra-lowOriginalVariable internetReceiving content from external encoders
SRT CallerUltra-lowOriginalVariable internetPulling content from external sources
RISTUltra-lowOriginalVariable internetPulling content from external sources
Elemental LinkLowOriginalStandard internetRemote production

When to Use Which Service

Choose AWS Elemental MediaLive When:

  • You need to encode or transcode live video
  • You require multiple output formats
  • You want to add graphics or captions
  • You need adaptive bitrate streaming
  • You're processing on-premises sources (MediaLive Anywhere)

Choose AWS Elemental MediaConnect When:

  • You need reliable video transport
  • You want to distribute live feeds globally
  • You require ultra-low latency
  • You need to maintain original quality
  • You're sharing feeds between AWS accounts

Integration Scenarios

Common Workflow Examples:

  1. End-to-End Cloud Processing

    • Source → AWS Elemental MediaLive (processing) → Distribution
    • Source → AWS Elemental MediaConnect (transport) → AWS Elemental MediaLive (processing) → Distribution
  2. Hybrid On-Premises/Cloud

    • Local Source → AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere (local processing) → Cloud Distribution
  3. Global Distribution

    • Source → AWS Elemental MediaConnect (transport) → Multiple Regions → AWS Elemental MediaLive (regional processing)

Cost Considerations

  • AWS Elemental MediaLive: Charged per channel-hour
  • AWS Elemental MediaConnect: Charged per output-hour and data transfer
  • AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere: Additional considerations for on-premises hardware

Latency Reference

  • Ultra-low: < 1 second
  • Very Low: 1-2 seconds
  • Low: 2-4 seconds
  • Medium: 4-8 seconds
  • High: 8+ seconds

Conclusion

The choice between AWS Elemental MediaLive and AWS Elemental MediaConnect depends on your specific needs:

  • Use AWS Elemental MediaLive for video processing and encoding requirements
  • Use AWS Elemental MediaConnect for reliable video transport
  • Consider AWS Elemental MediaLive Anywhere for on-premises processing needs
  • Both services can be used together for comprehensive workflows

For optimal results, evaluate your specific requirements for:

  • Processing needs
  • Quality requirements
  • Latency tolerance
  • Network conditions
  • Deployment location preferences

Reference URLs:

AWS Elemental MediaLive:

AWS Elemental MediaConnect:

Additional Resources

This guide serves as a decision-making tool for implementing the right combination of AWS Elemental services and input protocols for your specific video workflow needs.