Why do the CDK APIGWV2/Route53 docs say generate an A record rather than CNAME?

0

Why in the example from @aws-cdk-aws-route53-targets does the apigwv2 sample generate an A record rather than a CNAME record?

/* Example from @aws-cdk-aws-route53-targets, doesn't work - makes CDK hang */
import * as apigwv2 from '@aws-cdk/aws-apigatewayv2';

declare const zone: route53.HostedZone;
declare const domainName: apigwv2.DomainName;

new route53.ARecord(this, 'AliasRecord', {
    zone,
    target: route53.RecordTarget.fromAlias(
        new targets.ApiGatewayv2DomainProperties(domainName.regionalDomainName, domainName.regionalHostedZoneId)
    )
});

What I have always done (manually) is create a CNAME record to the API Gateway domain name listed under API Gateway / Custom Domain names in the console. I am not following this example or why you would want it to be an ARecord.

I changed the above code to this for my own and it seems to work:

/* my version, which works */
return new CnameRecord(this, `autofrog-phone-api-cname`, {
    recordName: 'phone',
    zone: this.zone,
    domainName: this.apiGatewayDomainName.regionalDomainName, /* instance of @aws-cdk/aws-apigatewayv2-alpha:IDomain */
    deleteExisting: false,
    comment: "added by cdk"
});
1 Antwort
0
Akzeptierte Antwort

I didn't know what an Alias record was until a few minutes ago.

Now I understand what they were doing.

profile picture
wz2b
beantwortet vor einem Jahr

Du bist nicht angemeldet. Anmelden um eine Antwort zu veröffentlichen.

Eine gute Antwort beantwortet die Frage klar, gibt konstruktives Feedback und fördert die berufliche Weiterentwicklung des Fragenstellers.

Richtlinien für die Beantwortung von Fragen