Differences between SecretCache and Lambda Extension

0

In case of Java Lambdas, is there any practical benefit in using SecretCache (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/secretsmanager/latest/userguide/retrieving-secrets_cache-java.html) over Secrets Lambda extension via layer (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/secretsmanager/latest/userguide/retrieving-secrets_lambda.html) and viceversa?

I could not find any comparison documentation, thanks.

profile picture
EXPERTE
gefragt vor 10 Monaten290 Aufrufe
1 Antwort
1
Akzeptierte Antwort

Hi, I may be wrong (I didn't test in details) but I see at least one interesting difference:

  1. the Secret cache is local to your Lambda execution. So, it's useful if you make several calls to SecretManager to obtain same secret multiple time during the execution of your Lambda.
  2. The Lambda extensions can be shared across multiple executions: so, you get the benefits of caching (less cost due to less API calls, reduced latency) multiple times.

This article shows the results across multiple executions with AWS Lambda Extension for Secrets: https://www.element7.io/2022/12/boost-performance-and-reduce-costs-using-lambda-extensions/

On https://github.com/aws/aws-secretsmanager-caching-java, the recommendation is to use the Secret Cache with

private final SecretCache cache = new SecretCache();

In this form, it will go away at the end of each Lambda execution

Best, Didier

profile pictureAWS
EXPERTE
beantwortet vor 10 Monaten
profile picture
EXPERTE
überprüft vor einem Monat
  • I think that execution reasoning makes sense, thanks :)

Du bist nicht angemeldet. Anmelden um eine Antwort zu veröffentlichen.

Eine gute Antwort beantwortet die Frage klar, gibt konstruktives Feedback und fördert die berufliche Weiterentwicklung des Fragenstellers.

Richtlinien für die Beantwortung von Fragen