- Neueste
- Die meisten Stimmen
- Die meisten Kommentare
The following official AWS website provides a comparison of EC2 and Lightsail. [1]
[1] Compare Amazon EC2 and Amazon Lightsail
https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/lightsail-differences-from-ec2/?nc1=h_ls
Since your application seems to do video streaming, it seems to me that you would need a reasonable specification.
Also, you may need to consider scalability, etc., so EC2 is probably a better choice.
However, we do not know the specific performance requirements of your application, so please consider verifying this if necessary.
I understand that you are trying to configure the most efficient architecture for your dynamic web application. I have suggested a solution based on the information you have provided; however, please research the benefits and use-cases for EC2 and Lightsail outside of this response. EC2 best fits the requirements listed above for the following reasons:
- Video streaming may require more computationally intensive loads than what Lightsail has to offer
- EC2 has many options for compute optimization that are not possible in Lightsail
- EC2 offers pay-as-you-go pricing which provides a balance between performance and cost optimization
Here are a few resources to help determine which service is best for your use-case:
https://aws.amazon.com/free/compute/lightsail-vs-ec2/ https://aws.amazon.com/lightsail/ https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/
Relevanter Inhalt
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor 2 Jahren
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor 2 Jahren
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor 2 Jahren
- AWS OFFICIALAktualisiert vor einem Jahr