2 Respuestas
- Más nuevo
- Más votos
- Más comentarios
0
Hello.
As you know, it is possible to host React.js on S3.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/patterns/deploy-a-react-based-single-page-application-to-amazon-s3-and-cloudfront.html
In terms of server management costs, I think hosting with S3 will be cheaper.
There shouldn't be much of a difference in data transfer charges between EC2 and S3.
https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/?nc1=h_ls
https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/?nc1=h_ls#Data_Transfer
0
S3 will be cheaper , you only pay storage. Data transfer will apply to both
respondido hace 7 meses
Contenido relevante
OFICIAL DE AWSActualizada hace un año- OFICIAL DE AWSActualizada hace 2 años
- OFICIAL DE AWSActualizada hace 2 años
Agreed, If you compare monthly storage price of 1 GB in S3 to the hourly cost of your instance of choice, you'll be able to compute the savings
If you put CloudFront in front of the S3 bucket, the data transfer costs will generally lower than serving from S3 directly plus it has quite a generous free tier.
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/