3 réponses
- Le plus récent
- Le plus de votes
- La plupart des commentaires
2
It's correct that, if you want to have different workflows per branch, one workflow will be inactive in each branch. Would you prefer to be able to hide inactive workflows in the future?
1
The BranchName workflow source variable will reference the current branch, though I can't think of a way to trigger workflows based on that. Let us know if this helps!
Thanks this is a good step. I Will try it out.
1
yeah. It will be so much cleaner on the dashboard.
Also is there a way to reference the current branch in the yml config file? In GH-Actions you could do something like github.ref. This way we could have conditional triggers based on current branch
répondu il y a 5 mois
Contenus pertinents
- demandé il y a un an
- demandé il y a un an
- demandé il y a un an
- demandé il y a un an
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a 3 ans
- AWS OFFICIELA mis à jour il y a un an
Hide inactive would be good. Also maybe a global setting to only use workflows for a named list of branches. My environment can have a lot of branches which makes the workflows dashboards horrible.