RowCount for DynamoDB

0

Customer that is looking for the most efficient way to get a item count from dynamoDB

QUERY method and then count individual records (the issue here is it’s a paginated method so we might have to count incrementally)

SCAN and use the count returned (Scan would be slow?)

posta 5 anni fa18560 visualizzazioni
2 Risposte
0
Risposta accettata

The most efficient way to get an item count from DynamoDB Query operation is to use Select COUNT request parameter. This allows you to answer questions such as: how many items there are for the given partition key with the sort key in the given range, where the range can change from one request to another. Questions like this cannot be answered by keeping a running count, as you can't keep the count for every possible range. The query performance as well as cost will depend on the number of items scanned, so they would need to test to find out if the latency and cost are acceptable for their use case.

The running count approach works well for deterministic queries and aggregates, such as the total count for a table, or key, for example. This approach can be implemented with DynamoDB triggers which consist of a stream on the table with a Lambda function doing the aggregation and storing the aggregates to another DynamoDB table, for example.

AWS
con risposta 5 anni fa
0

One of the ways to get the total item count is to use "DescribeTable" API and use the "Table.ItemCount" response attribute.

Note: This might give stale results as the data is updated approximately every six hours.

AWS
Deep
con risposta 2 anni fa

Accesso non effettuato. Accedi per postare una risposta.

Una buona risposta soddisfa chiaramente la domanda, fornisce un feedback costruttivo e incoraggia la crescita professionale del richiedente.

Linee guida per rispondere alle domande