1 Risposta
- Più recenti
- Maggior numero di voti
- Maggior numero di commenti
0
Seems like you are reading Source A table and combining that with processed table B. In that case I would say simple overwrite the result in B and combine Table A and B all the time in glue job.
con risposta 2 anni fa
Contenuto pertinente
- AWS UFFICIALEAggiornata 3 anni fa
- AWS UFFICIALEAggiornata 2 anni fa
- AWS UFFICIALEAggiornata 2 anni fa
In that case I would have to process the entire table B all the time in order not to loose any records (e.g. that are not in the currently processed batch due to bookmarking). For large tables B that does not sound very efficient to me.