incorrect grouping

0

Athena and redshift are incorrectly grouped under analytics. quicksight is the correct tool in that category. But redshift should be under database. https://i.stack.imgur.com/8O65F.png

質問済み 2年前173ビュー
2回答
0

Hi,

while it is correct that Athena is an SQL engine, and Refshift it is a DataBase, they are mostly used in Analytics workloads (ad-hoc queries and analysis) and Data Warehousing and ML (Redshift ML), hence the current classification.

you can also check external sources which define Analytics databases as this one. And you will notice the classification of Presto and Amazon Redshift in this category as well.

hope this helps clarifying.

AWS
エキスパート
回答済み 2年前
0

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehousing service, specifically designed for online analytic processing (OLAP) and business intelligence (BI) applications. This is different from most relational databases that are focussed on row-based transactions (OLTP). The analytics use case means it is grouped with the analytics services.

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena does not manage the data, or the S3 objects the data is stored in, so is not classed as a database service.

The key differences between Amazon Redshift and Postgres are described in this doc https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/c_redshift-and-postgres-sql.html

This doc goes into more detail on why columnar storage is important for analytic query performance https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/c_columnar_storage_disk_mem_mgmnt.html

AWS
回答済み 2年前

ログインしていません。 ログイン 回答を投稿する。

優れた回答とは、質問に明確に答え、建設的なフィードバックを提供し、質問者の専門分野におけるスキルの向上を促すものです。

質問に答えるためのガイドライン

関連するコンテンツ