incorrect grouping

0

Athena and redshift are incorrectly grouped under analytics. quicksight is the correct tool in that category. But redshift should be under database. https://i.stack.imgur.com/8O65F.png

질문됨 2년 전173회 조회
2개 답변
0

Hi,

while it is correct that Athena is an SQL engine, and Refshift it is a DataBase, they are mostly used in Analytics workloads (ad-hoc queries and analysis) and Data Warehousing and ML (Redshift ML), hence the current classification.

you can also check external sources which define Analytics databases as this one. And you will notice the classification of Presto and Amazon Redshift in this category as well.

hope this helps clarifying.

AWS
전문가
답변함 2년 전
0

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehousing service, specifically designed for online analytic processing (OLAP) and business intelligence (BI) applications. This is different from most relational databases that are focussed on row-based transactions (OLTP). The analytics use case means it is grouped with the analytics services.

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena does not manage the data, or the S3 objects the data is stored in, so is not classed as a database service.

The key differences between Amazon Redshift and Postgres are described in this doc https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/c_redshift-and-postgres-sql.html

This doc goes into more detail on why columnar storage is important for analytic query performance https://docs.aws.amazon.com/redshift/latest/dg/c_columnar_storage_disk_mem_mgmnt.html

AWS
답변함 2년 전

로그인하지 않았습니다. 로그인해야 답변을 게시할 수 있습니다.

좋은 답변은 질문에 명확하게 답하고 건설적인 피드백을 제공하며 질문자의 전문적인 성장을 장려합니다.

질문 답변하기에 대한 가이드라인

관련 콘텐츠