2개 답변
- 최신
- 최다 투표
- 가장 많은 댓글
0
We are using pyathenajdbc module due to Python. As the module name indicates, behinde the scene it is using jdbc driver provided by aws to query Athena. After compararision of pyathena (REST API based) module and pyathenajdbc (JDBC based), we found that JDBC driver based access is faster. Also, if you are using Java then JDBC based access should be fastest.
Another point, if you are using Python, then boto3 based access is even faster compared to JDBC driver, however you will have to write boilerplate code for having JDBC kind of interface.
Edited by: psl-shareinsights on May 2, 2019 5:18 AM
답변함 5년 전
관련 콘텐츠
- AWS 공식업데이트됨 2년 전
- AWS 공식업데이트됨 일 년 전
- AWS 공식업데이트됨 3년 전