- 최신
- 최다 투표
- 가장 많은 댓글
There's an interesting AWS disaster recovery lab that gives information you might be interested. This page: https://disaster-recovery.workshop.aws/en/services/databases/rds/rds-cross-region.html gives an overview of replication options for various RDS database types. Aurora global databases might also be of interest: https://disaster-recovery.workshop.aws/en/labs/advanced/aurora-global-database.html.
Being a good distance apart will always mean a compromise between transaction latency and RPO whichever option you choose.
Out of interest, is the multi-region design for performance (to keep data relatively close to users) or disaster recovery? I guess you could have a pair of databases, one active in each region with a corresponding passive replica in the other region.
관련 콘텐츠
- 질문됨 한 달 전
- AWS 공식업데이트됨 2년 전
Thanks! Your information is helpful.