- 최신
- 최다 투표
- 가장 많은 댓글
Hello.
Is it absolutely necessary to use Fargate for ECS?
If you use the EC2 launch type, you should be able to use EFS, FSx, etc.
You can use FSx if you do not use Fargate.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/wfsx-volumes.html
You cannot use FSx for Windows File Server volumes in a Windows containers on Fargate configuration.
Indeed, as mentioned here, Amazon EFS is not supported on Windows instances. If you plan to use Windows, your best choice for the file system is Amazon FSx for Windows File Server.
Amazon FSx has native support for Windows file system features and for the industry-standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol to access file storage over a network (see here).
There is an Amazon S3 MountPoint recently introduced. explored it if its suitable ? https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2023/03/mountpoint-amazon-s3/
관련 콘텐츠
- AWS 공식업데이트됨 일 년 전
We have considered to to use EC2 but then we don't get the benefits from a server less compute for containers.
I suppose we then need to maintenance the windows image ourselves then with service packs and updates?
Load balancing how does it work/best solution with EC2 mode vs FARGATE ? How fast it scales and pricing?