2 Answers
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Hello,
I found this accepted re:Post answer on a similar ask: AWS CUR re:Post.
If needed, our Billing & Accounts team can also be reached, here: go.aws/support-center.
- Elle G.
0
Hello, let me help explain this common confusion with Savings Plans reporting:
-
Main Reason for Discrepancy: The Savings Plans Coverage Report and CUR calculate covered spend differently:
- Coverage Report: Shows the theoretical maximum coverage based on your Savings Plan commitment and eligible usage
- CUR: Shows the actual applied savings and usage at a more granular level
-
Key Differences:
- Coverage Report aggregates data at a higher level and might include:
- Partial hour coverage
- Instance size flexibility calculations
- Regional benefit calculations for regional SPs
- CUR shows the actual transaction-level data with:
- Exact usage records
- Actual savings applied
- More granular timing
- Coverage Report aggregates data at a higher level and might include:
-
Source of Truth:
- For financial/billing reconciliation: Use the CUR
- For Savings Plan optimization and coverage analysis: Use the Coverage Report
-
Additional Verification: To cross-validate, you might want to:
- Check if you're including all relevant line item types in CUR
- Verify the time periods match exactly
- Ensure you're accounting for any timezone differences
The discrepancy you're seeing is generally expected behavior due to these fundamental differences in how these reports calculate and present the data.
I hope this is helpful. If yes, would love your acceptance/upvote. Thank you!
Relevant content
asked 3 years ago
asked 4 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 4 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 4 years ago

Thanks, but that's a different issue, 'cos is related to the Savings Plans Fee itself, not the coverage report