Optimizing AWS Savings: Commitment Strategies for Dealing with Peak Usage

Question

If I'm using an AWS savings plan and I'm thinking of purchasing an add-on, would it be wise to invest a little more in the commitment, even though I know there might be some waste, in order to deal more effectively with usage peaks? For example, if AWS suggests saving around $7.6 with a commitment of hours in the savings plan, would it be justifiable to purchase a commitment of around $9 hours?

Answer

Hi, Increasing your AWS Savings Plan commitment has both pros and cons.

**Pros:**

* **Reduced Risk of Underutilization:** A higher commitment gives you a buffer for usage spikes, avoiding higher On-Demand rates and maximizing savings.
* **Deeper Discounts:** Committing more can unlock greater discounts, beneficial for volatile usage patterns.

**Cons:**

* **Wasted Spend:** Paying for unused hours can negate savings if you consistently underutilize your commitment.
* **Reduced Flexibility:** A larger commitment can limit your ability to adapt to changing needs, locking you into specific usage levels.
* **Potential Overinvestment:** The costs might not justify the benefits if usage peaks are rare or unpredictable.

Additional Considerations:

* **Analyze Usage Patterns:** Understanding your usage can help estimate needed buffer.
* **Weigh Costs:** Compare On-Demand rates and Savings Plan discounts to justify commitment.
* **Risk Tolerance:** Consider if you're comfortable with potentially wasting money for coverage peace of mind.
* **Explore Alternatives:** Look into Reserved Instances or Spot Instances for certain workloads or peaks.

**Strategies:**

* **Multiple Smaller Plans:** Gives more control over spending.
* **Reserved Instances for Predictable Workloads:** Can be more cost-effective for consistent usage.
* **Spot Instances for Flexible Workloads:** Offers savings for interruptible tasks.

Optimizing AWS Savings: Commitment Strategies for Dealing with Peak Usage

Relevant content