- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
Based on the information provided, it appears that there are some limitations and considerations when working with S3 tables catalog integration in AWS Lake Formation that are affecting your ability to create a resource-linked database to a shared catalog.
-
Resource links to custom catalogs: Currently, resource links are primarily designed to work with the default AWS Glue Data Catalog. The S3 tables catalog integration (s3tablescatalog) is a separate feature that may not fully support resource linking in the same way as the default catalog.
-
Limitations of S3 tables catalog integration: There are several limitations when integrating S3 table buckets and tables with AWS Glue Data Catalog and Lake Formation. For instance, the LF-Tag Based Access Control (LF-TBAC) method for granting permissions is not supported for catalogs, databases, and tables that have S3 Tables as their storage location.
-
API limitations: Some APIs have limitations when working with S3 tables. For example, the SearchTables API cannot search S3 tables, which might affect how resource links are created or managed.
-
Permissions: While you have set the appropriate Lake Formation permissions, it's important to note that when accessing a target database or table through a resource link, you must have both AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) and Lake Formation permissions on both the target and the resource link. The Lake Formation permission required on resource links is DESCRIBE.
-
Creating resource links: The process for creating resource links to shared databases typically involves using the AWS Glue create-database command with the --database-input parameter. However, this process may not work as expected with custom catalogs like s3tablescatalog.
Given these limitations and considerations, it's possible that resource-linked databases may not be fully supported when the source catalog is a custom catalog like s3tablescatalog/my-bucket. You might need to explore alternative approaches for accessing and managing data across catalogs in this scenario.
To move forward, you could consider:
- Contacting AWS support for specific guidance on working with S3 tables catalog and resource links.
- Exploring alternative data sharing methods that are compatible with S3 tables catalog integration.
- Investigating if there are any recent updates or feature releases that address these limitations.
Remember that AWS services and features are continually evolving, so it's always a good idea to check the latest documentation and release notes for any updates that might address these issues.
Sources
S3 tables catalog integration limitations - AWS Lake Formation
Creating a resource link to a shared Data Catalog database - AWS Lake Formation
Resource link handling in AWS Glue APIs - AWS Lake Formation
Enabling Amazon S3 Tables integration - AWS Lake Formation
Relevant content
- asked 3 months ago
- asked a year ago