- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
The following documents are record types supported by Route53.
As far as I can tell from this document, SSHFP records are not supported.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/Route53/latest/DeveloperGuide/ResourceRecordTypes.html
Please check with AWS Support for additional feature requests.
Hi, I try to move Nameserver from one.com to Route53. Now I am left with the 2 entries for SSHFP that I can not type into Rout53 and don`t know, if they are essential or if I can just leave them out, as I continue to run an email account at one.com on this domain. Does anyone know the side effects, not migrating the 2 entries SSHFP? Or is there a workaround? Thanks.
Hi Dirk, While sshfp is an important security technology, they are not essential. Basically what these DNS entries did was help to protect your Secure Shell service from being impersonated. Without it, you need to be more careful what you ssh to but not migrating them isn't going to stop anything working.
Relevant content
- asked 2 years ago
- asked a year ago
- Accepted Answerasked 2 months ago
- asked 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 5 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a year ago
Hey Drik, refer to Riku's answer, SSHFP records are not yet supported by Route53.