Skip to content

Trouble accessing secret values through Lambda function

1

I'm having trouble accessing the secret values I've set for my Lambda function fetchData. I tried adding the AWS SDK v3 code from this section of the Amplify Docs to the generated app.js file for my function but it seems the code doesn't work because nothing is being logged into the console when I run amplify mock function fetchData in my terminal.

Also, when I log the secret values into the console (declared with process.env.INSERT_NAME_HERE), I only get the Name value of the parameter and not the actual value.

Here's my app.js file as well as the rest of my repository for reference: https://github.com/fantasy-thrill/yapper-msg-app/blob/second_test/amplify/backend/function/fetchData/src/app.js

  • Hows your lambda function set up from a network point of view? What permissions does the lambda role have?

  • @Gary What do you mean by "network point of view"? And do you mean CRUD permissions?

  • Is it vpc attached? Is it in private subnet. Do you have NAT gateway? What’s your security groups like? Do you have VPC endpoints? What iam role and policies does it have attached?

  • @Gary I have no idea what those things are, besides the IAM roles and policies. How do I check them?

7 Answers
1
Accepted Answer

SECOND UPDATE: I've still been unsuccessful with trying to connect to my MongoDB cluster via my Lambda function despite everything I've tried, so I've decided to switch to DynamoDB instead. I transferred all information from my database clusters to my DynamoDB tables I created. Fetching data from these tables has been successful.

Based on your responses @Aaron, I'm not sure if you're a real human or an AI bot, but thank you for trying to help me out.

answered 2 years ago

1

Greeting

Hi Ryan!

I completely get how complex Lambda and Amplify can feel when dealing with secrets—it’s like solving a puzzle that doesn’t quite fit together. Amplify’s mock environments, IAM permissions, and secret management can feel overwhelming, but we’ll tackle this step by step to make it work both locally and live. Let’s turn this into a win for you! 😊


Clarifying the Issue

From what you’ve shared, you’re dealing with two specific challenges:

  1. When running amplify mock function, your Lambda isn’t logging secret values, and nothing appears in your terminal.
  2. In your deployed environment, process.env.INSERT_NAME_HERE is returning only the Name of the secret, not its actual Value.

This is a common scenario because Amplify’s local mock environments don’t simulate secure AWS services like SSM Parameter Store, and live deployments require specific configurations to decrypt and fetch secrets. No worries—we’ll clarify and solve this step by step!


Why This Matters

Secrets like database credentials and API keys are vital for secure application functionality. Mismanaging these can lead to broken applications or worse, exposing sensitive data. Solving this issue gives you confidence in handling secrets securely across local and live environments, which is essential as your application scales.


Key Terms

  • SSM Parameter Store: AWS service for storing secrets and configuration securely.
  • Environment Variables: Variables set in your Lambda function that map to secrets or configuration data.
  • IAM Role: Permissions assigned to your Lambda function that allow it to interact with AWS services.
  • AWS SDK v3: The most recent version of AWS’s library for accessing services programmatically.
  • Amplify Mock Function: A local testing feature that simulates your Lambda function but doesn’t access AWS services directly.

The Solution (Our Recipe)

Steps at a Glance:

  1. Verify IAM Role Permissions for Lambda.
  2. Configure Secrets in Amplify CLI.
  3. Understand Mock Environment Limitations.
  4. Validate process.env Values Locally.
  5. Retrieve Secrets Securely in Code Using AWS SDK v3.
  6. Debug Issues with CloudWatch Logs.
  7. Test Locally and Push to Live Environment.

Step-by-Step Guide:

  1. Verify IAM Role Permissions for Lambda
    Your Lambda function needs permissions to access SSM Parameter Store. Add the following policy to the IAM role attached to your function:
    {
      "Version": "2012-10-17",
      "Statement": [
        {
          "Effect": "Allow",
          "Action": "ssm:GetParameters",
          "Resource": "arn:aws:ssm:REGION:ACCOUNT_ID:parameter/*"
        }
      ]
    }
    Replace REGION and ACCOUNT_ID with your AWS region and account ID. This ensures your Lambda function can fetch secrets securely.

  1. Configure Secrets in Amplify CLI
    Use Amplify CLI to configure or update secrets. This ensures Amplify stores your secrets securely in SSM Parameter Store and maps them to environment variables:
    amplify update function
    ? Which setting do you want to update? Secret values configuration
    ? What do you want to do? Add a secret
    Enter the secret name (e.g., CONNECTION_STRING) and value when prompted. Amplify will automatically handle secure storage in SSM.

  1. Understand Mock Environment Limitations
    Amplify’s amplify mock function does not access AWS services like SSM. Instead, it relies on local .env files to simulate secrets. To test locally:
    • Add dummy secret values to a .env file in your project directory:
      CONNECTION_STRING=mock_connection_string
      DB_NAME=mock_db_name
      
    • These values will be used during the mock run but won’t affect your deployed environment.

  1. Validate process.env Values Locally
    Confirm that process.env.SECRET_NAME variables in your Lambda function correctly map to the names of your secrets stored in SSM. Locally, these should match the keys in your .env file.

  1. Retrieve Secrets Securely in Code Using AWS SDK v3
    Use AWS SDK v3 to fetch and decrypt secrets in your Lambda function. Inline comments explain each step:
    const { SSMClient, GetParametersCommand } = require("@aws-sdk/client-ssm");
    
    // Initialize the SSM client
    const client = new SSMClient();
    
    // Create the command to fetch parameters securely
    const command = new GetParametersCommand({
      Names: ["CONNECTION_STRING", "DB_NAME"].map(secretName => process.env[secretName]), // Pass environment variables as names
      WithDecryption: true, // Ensure secrets are decrypted
    });
    
    // Send the command and handle the response
    client.send(command)
      .then(response => {
        console.log("Secrets retrieved successfully:", response.Parameters); // Log retrieved secrets
      })
      .catch(error => {
        console.error("Error retrieving secrets:", error); // Log errors for debugging
      });

  1. Debug Issues with CloudWatch Logs
    If secrets aren’t retrieved or errors occur, use CloudWatch logs to debug:
    • Go to the CloudWatch console.
    • Navigate to Log Groups and locate your Lambda function’s logs.
    • Look for:
      • Missing IAM permissions.
      • Incorrect secret names in process.env.
      • Errors related to SSM service calls.

  1. Test Locally and Push to Live Environment
    • Run amplify mock function to test locally using dummy .env values.
    • Deploy to AWS using amplify push, then test live with the actual secrets stored in SSM.

Closing Thoughts

Ryan, by following these steps, you’ll have your Amplify Lambda function securely retrieving secrets both locally and live. Understanding the differences between mock and live environments will help you troubleshoot and manage future challenges with confidence.

Here are some additional resources for reference:


Farewell

Ryan, I know Lambda can feel like a labyrinth, but you’re on the right track by asking questions and staying persistent. If you need clarification or run into new issues, don’t hesitate to ask—I’m here to help. You’ve got this! 🚀😊


Cheers,

Aaron 😊

answered 2 years ago

EXPERT

reviewed 2 years ago

  • I'll take all of this into account and give it a try. I'll let you know how it goes. Thank you

1

UPDATE: I was finally able to fetch the secrets from the parameter store using the SSM API. However, I have a new problem.

For some reason, my Lambda function is not able to connect to my MongoDB Atlas cluster. I've tried making sure that the connection string is correct and used VPC connection peering to allow AWS to connect to my cluster, but nothing has worked. I doubt anyone would be able to help with this since this is most likely a MongoDB problem and not an AWS problem, but I just wanted to let everyone know.

answered 2 years ago

1

Hey Ryan, I promise I’m human—just someone who enjoys troubleshooting AWS challenges and sharing knowledge. If you ever want to discuss cloud topics beyond this platform, I’m not hard to find. Glad DynamoDB worked out for you!

answered 2 years ago

0

@Aaron It's still not working for me. I keep getting the secret's Name value instead of its actual value. One interesting thing to note is that when I go to the function that uses the secret values in my console, and navigate to the "Environment variables" section under "Configuration", I see the keys of the secret values with their names as the value for each key. Here's what I mean:

Enter image description here

However, I'm sure I configured the secret values correctly. Here's a screenshot of my parameter store:

Enter image description here

Also, even with my .env file in my project, the "values" of the "environment variables" for my function keep getting logged in my console instead of the actual values of the secrets.

answered 2 years ago

0

Tackling Environment Variable and Secret Value Issues

Hi Ryan!

I see you're still facing challenges with the secrets configuration in your Lambda function. The behavior you described, where the name of the secret is being logged instead of the actual value, indicates a possible mismatch between how the secrets are stored, mapped, and accessed. Let's dig in further and resolve this step by step.


Clarifying the Problem

From your description:

  • The "Environment Variables" section in the AWS Lambda console displays the secret names as the values.
  • Even with a properly configured .env file and secret names, your Lambda function logs only the name of the secret, not its decrypted value.

This suggests that either:

  1. The secrets aren’t properly decrypted in the Lambda function.
  2. The mapping of environment variables to actual SSM Parameter Store values is incomplete or misconfigured.

Diagnosing and Fixing the Issue

  1. Validate SSM Parameter Store Configuration

    Double-check the secrets stored in the SSM Parameter Store:

    • Go to the SSM Parameter Store in your AWS Management Console.
    • Verify the keys and values for your parameters (e.g., CONNECTION_STRING).
    • Ensure that Type is set to SecureString and KMS Key ID matches the one used by your Lambda function's execution role.

  1. Check IAM Permissions

    Ensure the IAM role for your Lambda function has the correct permissions to access and decrypt secrets:

    {
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": [
        "ssm:GetParameters",
        "ssm:GetParameter",
        "kms:Decrypt"
      ],
      "Resource": [
        "arn:aws:ssm:REGION:ACCOUNT_ID:parameter/*",
        "arn:aws:kms:REGION:ACCOUNT_ID:key/YOUR_KEY_ID"
      ]
    }

    Replace REGION, ACCOUNT_ID, and YOUR_KEY_ID with the relevant details.


  1. Verify Lambda Environment Variable Mapping

    The environment variables in the Lambda function must correctly reference the SSM parameters:

    • In your Amplify CLI configuration, ensure secrets are mapped using amplify update function and selecting Secret values configuration.
    • Each secret should be tied to the corresponding key in SSM Parameter Store. For example:
      Key: CONNECTION_STRING
      Value: arn:aws:ssm:REGION:ACCOUNT_ID:parameter/CONNECTION_STRING
      

  1. Update Code to Fetch Decrypted Secrets

    Update your Lambda code to explicitly fetch and decrypt the secrets. Amplify-generated environment variables may only reference the name of the secret, so you need to retrieve the value programmatically. Use the following code:

    const { SSMClient, GetParametersCommand } = require("@aws-sdk/client-ssm");
    
    const client = new SSMClient();
    const command = new GetParametersCommand({
      Names: [process.env.CONNECTION_STRING], // Replace with your environment variable
      WithDecryption: true,
    });
    
    client.send(command)
      .then(response => {
        console.log("Decrypted secret:", response.Parameters[0].Value);
      })
      .catch(error => {
        console.error("Error fetching secret:", error);
      });

  1. Test Locally with .env

    For local testing, the .env file should provide mock values that match your deployed secrets. If you encounter the same logging issue locally:

    • Check the structure of the .env file to ensure keys and values are correctly defined:
      CONNECTION_STRING=mock_connection_string
      
    • Confirm that your code is correctly accessing the mock values:
      console.log("Local secret:", process.env.CONNECTION_STRING);

  1. Re-Deploy and Debug

    After verifying local behavior, deploy your updated function with amplify push. Check live behavior by reviewing:

    • CloudWatch logs for errors or misconfigurations.
    • The actual secret value returned in your Lambda function logs.

Closing Thoughts

By carefully verifying each step—from secret storage in SSM, to IAM permissions, to environment variable mapping—you’ll ensure your Lambda function can fetch and decrypt secrets both locally and in production. If this still doesn’t resolve the issue, feel free to share additional screenshots or code snippets, and we can troubleshoot further.

You’ve got this, Ryan! Let me know how it goes. 😊🚀


Cheers,

Aaron 😊

answered 2 years ago

0

Hi Ryan!

Great to hear you’ve successfully fetched secrets from the Parameter Store using the SSM API! 🎉 Now, let’s tackle this new MongoDB Atlas connectivity issue. You're right that it may seem MongoDB-specific, but AWS settings like VPC and security configurations often play a big role in such scenarios. Let’s address this step by step to troubleshoot the problem.

1. Verify Your Connection String

Ensure that your MongoDB Atlas connection string includes all necessary parameters, such as your username, password, and cluster details. It should look something like this:

mongodb+srv://<username>:<password>@cluster0.mongodb.net/<dbname>?retryWrites=true&w=majority

Common issues include:

  • Forgetting to URL-encode special characters in the password (e.g., replacing @ with %40).
  • Leaving out required query parameters like retryWrites=true&w=majority.

You can test your connection string locally using a MongoDB client like mongo or a tool like MongoDB Compass to ensure it’s functional outside of AWS.


2. Double-Check VPC and Networking

If you’re using VPC peering to connect AWS to MongoDB Atlas, confirm the following:

  • VPC Peering Status: In the MongoDB Atlas dashboard, check if the VPC peering connection status is "active."
  • Security Groups: Ensure your Lambda function’s security group allows outbound traffic to the CIDR block of your MongoDB Atlas cluster. For example:
    • Outbound Rule: Protocol: TCP, Port: 27017 (or 27015-27017 for Atlas clusters), Destination: MongoDB Atlas VPC CIDR block.
  • Route Table: Confirm that your VPC’s route table has a route to the MongoDB Atlas VPC via the peering connection.
    • Example: Destination: 10.0.0.0/16 → Target: pcx-<your-peering-connection-id> (replace with your actual MongoDB VPC CIDR and peering connection ID).

3. Verify MongoDB Atlas IP Allowlisting

In MongoDB Atlas, your cluster must allow incoming connections from your Lambda’s IPs. If your Lambda is in a VPC:

  • Use a NAT Gateway or Elastic IP: Configure your Lambda to use a static public IP (via NAT gateway or an Elastic IP) and add it to the IP allowlist in MongoDB Atlas.
  • If you’re using private connectivity (e.g., VPC peering), ensure that Atlas is configured to allow connections from your VPC CIDR block or security group.

4. Set Up a Test Function

To narrow down the problem, create a minimal Node.js script in your Lambda function that connects to MongoDB:

const { MongoClient } = require("mongodb");

const uri = process.env.MONGO_URI; // Replace with your secret or environment variable

exports.handler = async (event) => {
  const client = new MongoClient(uri);

  try {
    await client.connect();
    console.log("Connected successfully to MongoDB Atlas!");
    return { statusCode: 200, body: "Connection Successful!" };
  } catch (err) {
    console.error("Connection failed:", err);
    return { statusCode: 500, body: `Error: ${err.message}` };
  } finally {
    await client.close();
  }
};

Deploy and test this Lambda function. Check CloudWatch logs for errors like timeouts, authentication failures, or DNS resolution issues.


5. Common Issues and Fixes

Here are some potential issues and how to resolve them:

  • Timeouts: If your Lambda cannot reach MongoDB Atlas, double-check VPC peering, security groups, and route tables.
  • DNS Resolution: Ensure your Lambda can resolve the mongodb+srv hostname. If using private DNS, ensure proper VPC settings for DNS resolution.
  • Authentication Errors: Verify the username and password in your connection string and ensure the database user has the correct roles for accessing the target database.

6. Use AWS Lambda Layers for MongoDB Dependencies

If you’re using a Lambda runtime that doesn’t natively include the required MongoDB driver, you can package it as a Lambda Layer. This avoids potential compatibility issues.


Closing Thoughts

By systematically checking the connection string, VPC peering, security group rules, and MongoDB Atlas settings, you should be able to pinpoint the issue. If the problem persists, sharing error messages from your Lambda logs would help us dive deeper into the root cause.

Let me know how it goes, and we’ll keep pushing forward! 🚀😊

Cheers,
Aaron 😊

answered 2 years ago

You are not logged in. Log in to post an answer.

A good answer clearly answers the question and provides constructive feedback and encourages professional growth in the question asker.