- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
When you purchase a Savings Plan, you're making a commitment to use a certain amount of compute resources (in your case, $0.10 per hour) for the duration of the plan (1 year). This commitment is billed regardless of whether you fully utilize it.
The additional $400 you saw in your forecast likely represents the total commitment cost for your Savings Plan over the forecast period. For a $0.10/hour commitment over 1 year, the total commitment would be approximately: $0.10/hour × 24 hours × 365 days = $876 for the year
Depending on the forecast period you were looking at, you might have seen a portion of this total commitment. For example, if looking at a forecast for about 6 months, you'd see around $400-$450.
To correctly set up a Savings Plan that will actually save you money:
-
Analyze your consistent usage patterns to determine an appropriate commitment level. Don't commit to more than your baseline usage.
-
Ensure the instances you're running (t4g.medium in your case) are covered by the type of Savings Plan you purchase. EC2 Instance Savings Plans are specific to instance families in a region.
-
Remember that Savings Plans apply to eligible usage up to your commitment amount. Any usage beyond that will be charged at on-demand rates.
-
Check the utilization reports after purchasing to ensure your plan is being fully utilized. A utilization rate close to 100% indicates you're maximizing your savings.
If your instance usage is very low or inconsistent, a Savings Plan might not be the most cost-effective option. Consider reviewing your actual usage patterns over time before committing to a new plan.
Sources
Violations to EC2 Saving plans | AWS re:Post
Savings plan - not showing any savings and making sure its correct | AWS re:Post
Stacking of EC2 Saving Plans on the same Instance Familiy | AWS re:Post
Relevant content
asked 3 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 4 years ago

This 400 USD was in forecast for only September