In your case, MediaPackage is not needed since packaging is already done.
However, please keep in mind that s3 was not designed for video streaming. You might want to consider using MediaStore. It is built on top of S3 with additional caching layer that is optimized for media streaming. Your users can get low latency read performance optimized for media-specific access patterns.
thanks for your reply. I've a clearer understanding now.
I'll consider MediaStore as a more suitable alternative to S3 for video assets.
Video On Demand: Elemental MediaPackage vs Direct S3 accessasked 3 years ago
What should I use between MediaStore vs MediaPackage ?asked 3 years ago
Implementing DRM on Video on Demand Solutions on AWSasked a year ago
AWS Elemental MediaPackage - Video output issues after updating CF stackasked a year ago
Video On Demand Website on Amazon LightSailasked 8 months ago
How to use Low-Latency HLS with MediaPackage?asked 6 months ago
Elemental MediaPackage MPD or HLS playback from middleasked 8 months ago
Video on Demand with MediaPackage, S3 and ffmpegasked 3 years ago
Elemental Mediaconvert job template for Video on DemandAccepted Answerasked 7 months ago
Video delivery speed in AWS S3 storageasked a month ago