Skip to content

Overlay Routing Best Practice for Outbound-Only Traffic with Palo Alto VM + GWLB (100+ VPCs)

0

Hi all,

We're using Palo Alto VM-Series firewalls with Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB) to inspect outbound-only traffic from 100+ VPCs via Transit Gateway. Traffic hits GWLB endpoints, goes through the firewall, and exits via NAT Gateway or IGW.

We’ve seen that overlay routing enables two-zone policy enforcement and clean egress paths, but some sources suggest it’s optional if using a single interface.

Can someone clarify:

1.Is overlay routing recommended or required for outbound-only inspection?

2.Are there risks in using a single interface (e.g., eth1/1.1 eth1/1.2 eth1/1.3) for both ingress and egress?

What’s the best practice for this kind of centralized egress setup at scale?

Thanks in advance!

1 Answer
0

For your centralized outbound-only traffic inspection setup with Palo Alto VM-Series firewalls behind Gateway Load Balancer (GWLB), here's guidance on overlay routing and interface configuration:

  1. Regarding overlay routing for outbound-only inspection:

Overlay routing is supported with Palo Alto firewalls and GWLB/GENEVE, and can be beneficial for outbound-only traffic inspection. It allows you to perform NAT directly on the Palo Alto appliances instead of using separate NAT Gateways, which could lead to cost savings at your scale of 100+ VPCs.

For centralized egress inspection where you're only handling outbound traffic (not ingress), overlay routing is a good option as it simplifies the traffic flow. The traffic can be source NATed (SNATed) to the interface IP of the Palo Alto appliance and sent directly to the internet.

  1. Regarding single interface usage:

Using a single interface for both ingress and egress traffic in your Palo Alto firewalls can work for outbound-only inspection scenarios. However, there are considerations:

  • If you later decide to add ingress traffic inspection with endpoints distributed into workload VPCs, using overlay routing with a single interface could create routing problems. This is because ingress traffic would need to return to the source GWLB endpoint and then be forwarded out of the IGW local to the workload, but overlay routing would send packets directly to the internet via the Palo Alto firewall, creating asymmetric flows.

  • For your current outbound-only use case, a single interface configuration can be sufficient if properly configured.

Best practices for your centralized egress setup at scale:

answered a year ago

You are not logged in. Log in to post an answer.

A good answer clearly answers the question and provides constructive feedback and encourages professional growth in the question asker.