1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Hi, I am afraid that '%' is greedy here: it eats all characters up to the end including the suffixes that you are looking for.
So, you may want to try something like _______[_][_]b
with _______ matching the exact number of chars of 1 of your tables with suffix _b to exclude to confirm the greedyness of %.
If confirmed, you can create such an exclusion rule for all possible name lengths of your use case. Yes, I know that it it not elegant but at least it's a workaround. In parallel, I would open a ticket with AWS Support to see if they have a better solution or can fix the greedyness of %.
Best,
Didier
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked 2 years ago
- asked 25 days ago
- Accepted Answerasked 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a year ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 19 days ago