Best approach for API Server on EC2 or ECS with Fargate

Hello.

Would it be better to build the Laravel API using a Dockerfile and create a container on ECS using Fargate? Will this resolve the server and Nginx issues?

What kind of error is occurring specifically?
Depending on the content of the error, I don't think it will be resolved even if you use ECS Fargate.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of each approach?

ECS can be easily deployed as long as you have a created Docker container.
Additionally, since it is a container, local development can be done using the container, so it has the advantage of not having to be too conscious of differences in the environment.
However, since it is a managed service, the cost may be higher than EC2 depending on the specifications.
Also, if you are not used to managing Docker containers, you may find it difficult to troubleshoot at first.

Given the desire for a well-architected and automated solution, the recommended approach is to use ECS with Fargate. It offers several advantages over the traditional EC2-based deployment.

Deploying the Laravel API on ECS with Fargate can provide better scalability, availability, and reduced operational overhead. Containerization ensures consistent and reproducible environments, improving the reliability and testability of your application. Additionally, the Fargate service handles the underlying infrastructure management, freeing your team from the burden of maintaining EC2 instances and the associated tasks, such as OS updates and security patches.

While adopting containerization may require your team to learn new skills and tools, the long-term benefits often outweigh the initial learning curve. Before making the switch, it's essential to evaluate your team's readiness, assess the costs and benefits, and conduct a proof-of-concept deployment to validate the feasibility. Developing a comprehensive migration plan can also help ensure a smooth transition from the existing EC2-based deployment to the containerized solution.