- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
The issue you're facing with AWS Glue job limits is a common challenge when dealing with a large number of tables. While the default limit for concurrent job runs per account is actually 30 (not 2000 as mentioned), there are several strategies you can employ to optimize your ETL process and work within the service quotas:
-
Job Queuing: Enable job queuing for your Glue jobs. This feature automatically queues job runs that exceed the concurrent job limit, putting them in a "WAITING" state until resources become available. To enable this in the AWS Glue Studio console, go to the Job details tab of your job and select "Enable job runs to be queued to run later when they cannot run immediately due to service quotas."
-
Batch Processing: Instead of triggering a separate Glue job for each table, consider modifying your approach to process multiple tables within a single Glue job. You can create a more dynamic ETL script that iterates through a list of tables and processes them in batches. This approach can significantly reduce the number of concurrent jobs needed.
-
Workflow Orchestration: Utilize AWS Glue Workflows to orchestrate your ETL process. A workflow can manage the execution of multiple jobs, crawlers, and triggers in a coordinated manner, helping you stay within service quotas while processing all your tables.
-
Increase Quotas: If you consistently need more concurrent runs, consider requesting a quota increase from AWS support. You can review your current quotas in the Service Quotas console and request increases for limits such as "Max concurrent job runs per account."
-
Optimize Job Resource Allocation: Ensure you're efficiently using resources within each job. You might be able to process multiple tables within a single job run by allocating more Data Processing Units (DPUs) to the job.
-
Implement a Backoff Strategy: In your Lambda function, implement a backoff strategy that spaces out job submissions to avoid overwhelming the system and hitting concurrency limits.
By implementing these strategies, particularly focusing on batch processing and workflow orchestration, you should be able to process all your tables efficiently while staying within AWS Glue's service quotas. Remember to monitor your job runs closely and adjust your approach as needed based on performance and quota utilization.
Sources
Glue queue: Max concurrent runs exceeded | AWS re:Post
Introducing job queuing to scale your AWS Glue workloads | AWS Big Data Blog
Converting ETL processes to AWS Glue in AWS Schema Conversion Tool - AWS Schema Conversion Tool
Yes, you can definitely configure a single AWS Glue job to process multiple tables, which would be a more efficient approach. Here are several ways to implement this:
- Dynamic Frame Collection Approach
import sys from awsglue.transforms import * from awsglue.utils import getResolvedOptions from pyspark.context import SparkContext from awsglue.context import GlueContext from awsglue.job import Job # Initialize context and job sc = SparkContext() glueContext = GlueContext(sc) spark = glueContext.spark_session job = Job(glueContext) args = getResolvedOptions(sys.argv, ['JOB_NAME']) job.init(args['JOB_NAME'], args) # Get all tables from the catalog database = "your_database_name" tables = glueContext.create_dynamic_frame_from_catalog( database=database ).toDF().collect() # Process each table for table in tables: # Read data from source dynamic_frame = glueContext.create_dynamic_frame.from_catalog( database=database, table_name=table.name ) # Your transformation logic here # Write to S3 glueContext.write_dynamic_frame.from_options( frame=dynamic_frame, connection_type="s3", connection_options={ "path": f"s3://your-bucket/{table.name}/" }, format="parquet" ) job.commit()
- Parameter-Based Approach
import sys import json from awsglue.transforms import * from awsglue.utils import getResolvedOptions from pyspark.context import SparkContext from awsglue.context import GlueContext from awsglue.job import Job # Initialize context and job sc = SparkContext() glueContext = GlueContext(sc) spark = glueContext.spark_session job = Job(glueContext) # Get job parameters args = getResolvedOptions(sys.argv, ['JOB_NAME', 'table_list']) table_list = json.loads(args['table_list']) # Process each table from the parameter for table in table_list: dynamic_frame = glueContext.create_dynamic_frame.from_catalog( database="your_database", table_name=table ) # Your transformation logic here # Write to S3 glueContext.write_dynamic_frame.from_options( frame=dynamic_frame, connection_type="s3", connection_options={ "path": f"s3://your-bucket/{table}/" }, format="parquet" ) job.commit()
- Configuration File Approach
import sys import boto3 import json from awsglue.transforms import * from awsglue.utils import getResolvedOptions from pyspark.context import SparkContext from awsglue.context import GlueContext from awsglue.job import Job def read_config_from_s3(bucket, key): s3 = boto3.client('s3') response = s3.get_object(Bucket=bucket, Key=key) return json.loads(response['Body'].read().decode('utf-8')) # Initialize context and job sc = SparkContext() glueContext = GlueContext(sc) spark = glueContext.spark_session job = Job(glueContext) # Read configuration config = read_config_from_s3('your-config-bucket', 'config.json') # Process tables based on configuration for table_config in config['tables']: dynamic_frame = glueContext.create_dynamic_frame.from_catalog( database=table_config['database'], table_name=table_config['table_name'] ) # Apply transformations based on config if 'transformations' in table_config: # Apply custom transformations pass # Write to S3 glueContext.write_dynamic_frame.from_options( frame=dynamic_frame, connection_type="s3", connection_options={ "path": table_config['target_path'] }, format=table_config.get('format', 'parquet') ) job.commit()
- Lambda Modification:
def lambda_handler(event, context): glue = boto3.client('glue') # Start single Glue job with table list response = glue.start_job_run( JobName='your_multi_table_job', Arguments={ '--table_list': json.dumps(['table1', 'table2', 'table3']) } ) return { 'statusCode': 200, 'body': json.dumps(f"Started job run: {response['JobRunId']}") }
This approach will:
- Reduce the number of concurrent Glue jobs
- Improve resource utilization
- Make the process more manageable
- Allow for better error handling and monitoring
- Provide more flexibility in how tables are processed
Remember to properly size your Glue job resources based on the total data volume you're processing, as you're now handling multiple tables in a single job.
Relevant content
- asked 3 years ago
- asked 3 years ago
- asked 2 years ago