- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
Hello Mo,
Thank you for contacting us with your question.
Please find my answers below:
Q1 -
I understand the difference between a private and public VIFs for accessing S3, however, I can't really decide which to use since we have no specific requirement, but what's the purpose of still accessing the bucket via a public IP over DX since I can already do that over the public internet? Any thoughts would be appreciated please.
There are few benefits using Public VIF to access S3. They are:
- Performance: Using Public VIF allows you to access the S3 resource via the AWS Backbone network using Direct Connect (DX). Hence, accessing the S3 resources can be more performance efficient than internet traffic.
- Data Transfer Costs: Data transfer out of S3 to the internet is typically more expensive than data transfer out of S3 to Direct Connect. If you're transferring large amounts of data, this could lead to significant cost savings. (doc: https://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/pricing/)
Q2 -
Assuming that I choose to use private links, then a pair of VIFs would also be enought for other resources, such as EC2, to be access over DX right?
Yes - you could access your private links (VPC endpoints) over DX if the traffic is not originated from the same VPC.
Q3 -
Do I need to deploy a virtual gateway at the destination AWS account (I will be sharing our DX connections across our different AWS accounts) for both types of VIFs? or a gateway is only needed for private VIFs please?
**Approach 1 Using VIF: ** For Private VIFs:
Yes, you MUST create and attach a Virtual Private Gateway (VGW) to your VPC in the destination AWS account This is mandatory for private VIFs as they are used to connect to resources within a VPC For Public VIFs:
No, you do NOT need a Virtual Private Gateway Public VIFs connect directly to AWS public services (like S3, DynamoDB, etc.) without requiring a VGW They work similarly to how you'd access AWS public services over the internet, just over the Direct Connect connection instead
If you're sharing DX across accounts: For Private VIFs:
Create VGW in each destination account Associate VGW with the target VPC The owner of the DX connection needs to allocate/share the private VIF to the destination account The destination account needs to accept the VIF For Public VIFs:
No VGW needed Simply allocate/share the public VIF to the destination accounts The destination accounts need to accept the VIF Reference Documentation:
Working with Virtual Interfaces Direct Connect Gateway associations
Approach 2: Using DX Gateways
DXGW provides a more scalable solution, especially when dealing with:
- Multiple VPCs across different regions
- Multiple AWS accounts
- Transit Gateway integration needs
This approach allows you to have:
- One-to-many relationship
- Simpler to manage at scale
- More cost-effective when connecting to multiple VPCs
- Better region support
- Higher bandwidth aggregation
Working with Direct Connect Gateways Direct Connect Gateway associations
Let me address your questions about accessing S3 over Direct Connect:
- While you can access S3 over the public internet, using a public VIF over Direct Connect provides several advantages:
- It bypasses internet service providers in your network path, providing more reliable connectivity
- It offers more consistent network performance and lower latency
- It provides a dedicated connection to AWS public services
- It's still more secure than going over the public internet since it's a dedicated connection
-
Yes, a pair of private VIFs would be sufficient for accessing other AWS resources like EC2 instances over Direct Connect. Private VIFs enable access to your VPC and hosted workloads. If you have multiple VPCs across different regions that need to be connected, you might want to consider using Transit VIFs instead, which simplify management of multiple connections through a single Direct Connect connection.
-
For connectivity types:
- For public VIFs: You don't need a virtual gateway as they connect directly to public AWS services
- For private VIFs: You do need a virtual gateway in each destination AWS account to connect to the VPCs in those accounts
- If you're sharing Direct Connect across multiple AWS accounts, you'll need to set up the appropriate gateway configurations in each account that needs access
If you're concerned about security when using public VIFs, you might prefer the private VIF approach through VPC interface endpoints, which doesn't require the additional configuration needed to filter advertised Amazon prefixes and addresses potential security concerns with connecting to the AWS public network.
Sources
Virtual interfaces (VIF) - AWS Direct Connect for Amazon Connect
When to Use Transit VIF vs. Private VIF with AWS Transit Gateway and Direct Connect? | AWS re:Post
Optimizing Amazon S3 data transfers over Direct Connect | Networking & Content Delivery
Good day Mo,
Thank you for your follow-up question! Please find my response for your follow-up question:
Thanks a lot for your detailed answer. I will go through it and get back to you. Another question for now please. assuming that I chose private VIFs for S3, would that incur any costs over DX?
Choosing private VIFs for S3 over public VIFs would generally not incur additional Direct Connect costs. However, there are some important considerations:
-
Direct Connect Costs: The cost for Direct Connect itself remains the same whether you use public or private VIFs. You pay for the port hours and data transfer out of AWS.
-
Data Transfer: Data transfer in to S3 is free. Data transfer out of S3 to your on-premises network via Direct Connect is charged at the standard Direct Connect data transfer rates.
Documentation: https://aws.amazon.com/directconnect/pricing/
Relevant content
- asked a year ago
- asked 2 years ago
- asked 2 years ago
- asked 3 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 5 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 9 months ago

Thanks a lot for your detailed answer. I will go through it and get back to you. Another question for now please. assuming that I chose private VIFs for S3, would that incur any costs over DX?