- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
Hello, DC2 is the previous generation node type and on its way to being deprecated. I would strongly suggest you consider upgrading to the ra3.xlplus node type (the smallest node type at the moment in the RA3 family). With RA3, you can use Amazon Redshift's native data sharing capability to setup a read-replica and workload isolation with just a few steps in the Redshift console, and since it's data sharing - the data is queried in-place without any physical copying or loading. It is also possible that when you upgrade to the ra3.xlplus, the newer node type will be able to handle all your workloads and the need for a read-replica will go away. This is the simplest solution with best-practices in mind. In addition to the ra3.xlplus node type, you could consider Amazon Redshift serverless if you workload only runs a few hours in the day. Hope this helps. Let me know if any other questions.
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked 2 years ago
- asked 3 years ago
- Accepted Answerasked 8 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 7 months ago
- What happens to Amazon RDS and Amazon Redshift queries that are running during a maintenance window?AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
It is more expensive that my current node, I will try to switch to serverless and monitor cost thanks !