1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Hi,
This question has already been answered and its answer been accepted.
See https://repost.aws/es/questions/QU1C60vSv3TS6neZ8mTKThIg/move-fsx-backuo-to-s3-then-to-glacier for the corresponding solution
Best,
Didier
Relevant content
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 3 years ago
I think the linked older reply about AWS DataSync is for a different use case. I believe AWS DataSync can only copy data, not move it, so while AWS DataSync could deliver the data in S3, the data would also remain in FSx. Costs would only increase, with the data duplicated between FSx and S3.