1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Is this for a one-shot migration or you intend to do this often (or continuously?) If this is a one-shot, as a work around you can create a table from this view and move that new table with DMS.
answered 2 years ago
Relevant content
- asked 2 years ago
- Accepted Answer
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 6 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
currently, one shot, but unless mysql and postgres became better than aurora, i cant stop thinking that this is a truly useful feature. The cost to materialize a view is too high
I have the same problem when replicating data from Aurora postgres to Aurora Postgres using DMS with views. The workaround of creating first the tables seems ok but has performance impact. Documentation indicates that the views are supported but no success