1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
1
Choosing between EC2 and Fargate essentially comes down to the level of control you need over your server environment and the associated costs. EC2 instances allow you to handle specific details about your server environment and are generally more cost-effective for continuous applications. Fargate, while more simple and automatically scalable, does come at a higher cost, especially for applications with high memory and CPU requirements.
For 24/7 applications with the minimum requirements of 8GB memory and 4 vCPUs, EC2 instances are often more cost-effective. However, Fargate's pricing can be economical if you only pay for the resources you need. It's crucial to balance cost, control, and simplicity in your decision.
answered 2 months ago
Relevant content
- Accepted Answerasked a year ago
- App with 2 microservices - should they run in two ECS clusters or two services in single ECS clusterAccepted Answerasked a year ago
- Accepted Answerasked 5 months ago
- How can I access an Amazon EMR cluster through an application if the cluster is in a private subnet?AWS OFFICIALUpdated 3 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago