DAX or Elastic Cache with DynamoDB

Question

DynamoDB has high read and write throughput. 
Is it better to use DAX or Elastic Cache, and what are the differences in every scenario? 
I also need guidance on how to use them effectively.

Accepted Answer

When choosing between Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) and Amazon ElastiCache to enhance the performance of Amazon DynamoDB, it's essential to understand the specific roles and strengths of each caching solution. Here's a breakdown of the differences and guidance on using them effectively:

**1. Amazon DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)**
DAX is a fully managed, highly available, in-memory cache specifically designed for DynamoDB. It's used to speed up read-intensive applications.

**Advantages**:
* Purpose-Built for DynamoDB: DAX is seamlessly integrated with DynamoDB, providing microsecond response times and reducing the response times from milliseconds to microseconds for cached reads.
* Write-Through Cache: DAX automatically updates the cache after write operations, ensuring data consistency between the cache and the DynamoDB table.
Ease of Integration: Implementing DAX requires minimal changes to your existing DynamoDB API calls. It supports most of the same read operations as DynamoDB.

**Use Cases**:
Applications requiring extremely low latency for read access.
Read-heavy applications where data is accessed frequently and needs microsecond response times.
Situations where consistency between cached data and the database is crucial.

**2. Amazon ElastiCache**
ElastiCache provides fully managed Redis or Memcached-compatible in-memory data stores. Unlike DAX, ElastiCache is not limited to DynamoDB and can be used with various data sources.

**Advantages**:
* Flexibility: ElastiCache can be used with any database or data source, not just DynamoDB. It supports complex data types and operations, such as lists, sets, and sorted sets in Redis.
* Scalability: ElastiCache allows for fine-grained control over the caching strategies and parameters, providing more flexibility in managing cache aside patterns.
* Advanced Data Structures: Redis offers advanced data structures which are suitable for complex applications like session stores, leaderboards, real-time analytics, and queues.

**Use Cases:**
Applications that require complex data operations not supported by DAX.
Systems where caching is needed for multiple databases or data sources.
Applications that can benefit from the advanced capabilities of Redis or need a Memcached-compatible in-memory store.

**Guidelines for Effective Usage**

**DAX**:

* Optimize Read Performance: Use DAX to reduce read latencies and improve throughput for frequently accessed data.
* Consistency: Consider the consistency requirements of your application. DAX provides eventual consistency for reads outside of transactions and strong consistency for transactional reads.

**ElastiCache:**
* Complex Data Handling: Use ElastiCache when your application requires complex data structures or needs to execute advanced operations that go beyond simple key-value access.
* Cache Management: Implement robust cache invalidation strategies to ensure that data in ElastiCache remains fresh and consistent with the underlying database.

**Cost Considerations**:
Both services come with costs based on the resources provisioned and the duration of use. Evaluate the cost implications based on your application's specific requirements.

**Conclusion**:
Choose DAX if you're primarily using DynamoDB and need the lowest possible latency for read operations with minimal setup complexity. Opt for ElastiCache if you need more flexibility, support for complex data structures, or are using multiple data sources.

DAX or Elastic Cache with DynamoDB

Relevant content