6 Answers
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
ideally it should work with [a-b]% but it is failing for me also you can rather use multiple selection rules e.g. which selects tables starting a b c from mydata schema
{
"rules": [
{
"rule-type": "selection",
"rule-id": "023641129",
"rule-name": "023641129",
"object-locator": {
"schema-name": "mydata",
"table-name": "c%"
},
"rule-action": "include",
"filters": [],
"parallel-load": null,
"isAutoSegmentationChecked": false
},
{
"rule-type": "selection",
"rule-id": "023631379",
"rule-name": "023631379",
"object-locator": {
"schema-name": "mydata",
"table-name": "b%"
},
"rule-action": "include",
"filters": [],
"parallel-load": null,
"isAutoSegmentationChecked": false
},
{
"rule-type": "selection",
"rule-id": "018911961",
"rule-name": "018911961",
"object-locator": {
"schema-name": "mydata",
"table-name": "a%"
},
"rule-action": "include",
"filters": [],
"parallel-load": null,
"isAutoSegmentationChecked": false
}
]
}
answered 6 months ago
0
I have 15 tables and have total 30k schemas. Its very difficult to mange with add section rules for each table. I have to add many schemas in the future with start with other letters. This is very bad that AWS still not fix this issue yet.
answered 6 months ago
0
if the 15 tables are common across schemas you can use % for schema name.
answered 6 months ago
0
I have different schema mapping requirement for each table so its difficult to add multiple selection rules for each letter for each table.
answered 6 months ago
Relevant content
- asked 3 months ago
- asked a year ago
- Accepted Answerasked a year ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated a year ago