- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
Hello,
If i am understanding your request correctly, you would like to publish identical output to two different destinations (Active Ingest and Backup Ingest) under single output group.
AWS MediaLive shouldn’t need a second encode if two outputs have exact identical configurations, but that’s not a very common use case, as it doesn't provide end to end redundancy.
I would encourage you to file a feature request through your account manager to get this to be implemented.
Also with that said, MediaLive only charges for Input once and depending on your outputs you are charged per output destination.
Thank you, Hope this answers your question.
Yes. As I said, I understand the encoder will still be a single point of failure. But the rest of our setup is still redundant in other parts. For example if one of my ingest servers go down. The single output forces me to use less redundancy than I have available.
I will look into creating a feature request for this. I will reluctantly mark this as answered.
Relevant content
- asked 4 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 10 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 6 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 7 months ago