Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

I tried to do Textract with one page pdf file using 1) Textract demo and 2) boto3 with sample code from here https://docs.aws.amazon.com/textract/latest/dg/examples-export-table-csv.html. However, the Textract demo gives better result than boto3. Why is that?

Martin Schade _AWS_
2 年前
Can you comment on what specifically works better in the Textract demo (assuming you refer to the AWS Console Textract experience). The Console shows merged cells, which in a CSV you won't see as merged cells are not supported.
Abduhoshim
7 个月前
I am also facing such situations while detecting tables and converting them into csv demo is doing great but boto3 has some problems

主题

机器学习和人工智能

标签

Amazon Textract 机器学习和人工智能

语言

English

aws-textract-user

已提问 2 年前536 查看次数

2 回答

最新
投票最多
评论最多

这些答案有用吗？为正确答案投票，以帮助社区从您的知识中受益。

Hi,

Please make sure you are using the same region when you are running Textract APIs. Also could you update your boto3 library using the following command: pip install --upgrade boto3

Thanks Ioan

Ioan

已回答 2 年前

A bit late to the show, but textract demo is async behind the curtains, so if you are not going the async route with boto3 you might get different results for the same document. I got this very well explained to myself in here: https://repost.aws/questions/QUfi_3FSF4S2SfXXCmCFiAcw#ANdC661SRES1WZXpfe3pctlg

jminvoke

已回答 2 个月前

Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

相关内容