Cannot create TXT record due to CNAME already existing?

Other DNS providers allow this option to happen. Why does Route 53 refuse to let me do this? Are my DNS rights being oppressed? As an example, other DNS providers let me do the following; CNAME: test.example.com -> www.anotherexample.com TXT: test.example.com -> "dnjsakdnjasnkdsanj"

主题

网络和内容交付

标签

路线 53 专用 DNS 域名系统 (DNS)

语言

English

dnsnewbie372189789

已提问 2 年前563 查看次数

1 回答

最新
投票最多
评论最多

Route 53 follows the DNS spec and CNAMEs can only exist alone for a particular name [1] (aside from DNSSEC records). In this case, those other DNS providers are out of spec.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc1034#page-15

Justin G

已回答 2 年前

dnsnewbie372189789
2 年前
Hey Justin, thanks for the update. Can you please confirm which DNS Spec they follow? I am trying to determine if it is RFC 1035 or RFC 2181.
Justin G
2 年前
I've updated the answer; it's RFC 1034.

Cannot create TXT record due to CNAME already existing?

相关内容