1 回答
- 最新
- 投票最多
- 评论最多
0
Your plan will work - it's pretty standard. VPN provides a private connection from the customer's network to the VPC where the EC2 instance is hosted. In the long term, Direct Connect may be a better option (it provides for dedicated bandwidth and more predictable latency) but it takes a bit more time to set up. You can switch from VPN to Direct Connect at a later stage with very little interruption.
相关内容
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 1 年前
Thank you so much for your quick response. Is it possible to remove NAT gateway and use any other way to facilitate patch updates to reduce cost?
If we eliminate the NAT Gateway, we would need to route from on-premises to the public network via Site to Site VPN. Running the patch manager itself should be no problem once the VPC endpoints are set up. When you run the patch manager, package updates, etc. will probably fail unless you have access to the public.
You haven't mentioned which operating system you're using; but in many cases you could have a single instance in a public subnet which downloads patches and then the instances on the private subnets retrieve patches from there. It may be simpler and easier to use NAT Gateway.