2 個答案
- 最新
- 最多得票
- 最多評論
0
Hello.
As you know, it is possible to host React.js on S3.
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/patterns/deploy-a-react-based-single-page-application-to-amazon-s3-and-cloudfront.html
In terms of server management costs, I think hosting with S3 will be cheaper.
There shouldn't be much of a difference in data transfer charges between EC2 and S3.
https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/?nc1=h_ls
https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/on-demand/?nc1=h_ls#Data_Transfer
相關內容
- 已提問 7 個月前
- 已提問 7 個月前
- 已提問 1 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 4 個月前
Agreed, If you compare monthly storage price of 1 GB in S3 to the hourly cost of your instance of choice, you'll be able to compute the savings
If you put CloudFront in front of the S3 bucket, the data transfer costs will generally lower than serving from S3 directly plus it has quite a generous free tier.
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/