Buildspec in CloudFormation template or separate buildspec.yml file?

0

I am updating an old CloudFormation template. The template has three CodeBuild projects and one CodePipeline to tie everything together. The CodeBuild projects have the BuildSpec right in the template. The BuildSpecs are not very complex, but they are out of date. My question is whether it would be better to continue to work with the BuildSpec(s) in the CloudFormation template, or to create them as separate buildspec.yml files in my repository? What are the pros and cons? What are best practices in this area?

已提問 7 個月前檢視次數 429 次
1 個回答
1
已接受的答案

Hi,

Whether to keep the BuildSpec directly in the CloudFormation template or to manage them as separate buildspec.yml files depends on your specific use case and team preferences.
In general, the practice followed is:

  • if the BuildSpec is very small and not meant to be reused, then it is good to have it embedded.
  • if the BuildSpec is complex and being reused, and requires frequent maintenance/updates, it is ideal to have it in separate files.

I have tried to summarize the difference in points to help you make an informed decision:

  1. BuildSpec in CloudFormation Template:
    • Pros: Easier management, versioning tied with infrastructure.
    • Cons: Limited reusability, less visibility.
  2. Separate buildspec.yml Files:
    • Pros: Better reusability, enhanced visibility, easy integration with version control tools.
    • Cons: Slightly more complex deployment, potential sync issues.

In my opinion, separate buildspec.yml files are the best, providing easier management, better extensibility, reusability, and future-proof solution.

Thanks,
Atul

profile picture
已回答 7 個月前

您尚未登入。 登入 去張貼答案。

一個好的回答可以清楚地回答問題並提供建設性的意見回饋,同時有助於提問者的專業成長。

回答問題指南