1 個回答
- 最新
- 最多得票
- 最多評論
0
Option 2 is advisable. It is free of cost, because it's an alias for a chargeable AWS resource that is the ALB, and it performs better, because the client will get the IP addresses directly, rather than having to perform a second query to resolve the name the CNAME points to into an IP address.
The alias option also doesn't expose the native DNS name of the load balancer to the outside world, which the CNAME would do.
相關內容
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 8 個月前
- AWS 官方已更新 1 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前