2 個答案
- 最新
- 最多得票
- 最多評論
0
In your case, MediaPackage is not needed since packaging is already done.
However, please keep in mind that s3 was not designed for video streaming. You might want to consider using MediaStore. It is built on top of S3 with additional caching layer that is optimized for media streaming. Your users can get low latency read performance optimized for media-specific access patterns.
https://aws.amazon.com/mediastore/features/
已回答 4 年前
0
Hi bingaws,
thanks for your reply. I've a clearer understanding now.
I'll consider MediaStore as a more suitable alternative to S3 for video assets.
Bye.
已回答 4 年前
相關內容
- AWS 官方已更新 3 年前