Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

I tried to do Textract with one page pdf file using 1) Textract demo and 2) boto3 with sample code from here https://docs.aws.amazon.com/textract/latest/dg/examples-export-table-csv.html. However, the Textract demo gives better result than boto3. Why is that?

Martin Schade _AWS_
2 年前
Can you comment on what specifically works better in the Textract demo (assuming you refer to the AWS Console Textract experience). The Console shows merged cells, which in a CSV you won't see as merged cells are not supported.
Abduhoshim
7 個月前
I am also facing such situations while detecting tables and converting them into csv demo is doing great but boto3 has some problems

主題

機器學習與 AI

標籤

Amazon Textract 機器學習與 AI

語言

English

aws-textract-user

已提問 2 年前檢視次數 539 次

2 個答案

最新
最多得票
最多評論

這些答案是否有幫助？支持正確答案，以幫助社區從您的知識中受益。

Hi,

Please make sure you are using the same region when you are running Textract APIs. Also could you update your boto3 library using the following command: pip install --upgrade boto3

Thanks Ioan

Ioan

已回答 2 年前

A bit late to the show, but textract demo is async behind the curtains, so if you are not going the async route with boto3 you might get different results for the same document. I got this very well explained to myself in here: https://repost.aws/questions/QUfi_3FSF4S2SfXXCmCFiAcw#ANdC661SRES1WZXpfe3pctlg

jminvoke

已回答 2 個月前

Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

相關內容