2 個答案
- 最新
- 最多得票
- 最多評論
0
We are using pyathenajdbc module due to Python. As the module name indicates, behinde the scene it is using jdbc driver provided by aws to query Athena. After compararision of pyathena (REST API based) module and pyathenajdbc (JDBC based), we found that JDBC driver based access is faster. Also, if you are using Java then JDBC based access should be fastest.
Another point, if you are using Python, then boto3 based access is even faster compared to JDBC driver, however you will have to write boilerplate code for having JDBC kind of interface.
Edited by: psl-shareinsights on May 2, 2019 5:18 AM
已回答 5 年前
相關內容
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 3 年前
- AWS 官方已更新 2 年前