Use New DynamoDB Point-in-time Recovered Table Or Copy New Table Over Original Table?

0

We want to have a Lambda point at a small, yet important DynamoDB table that has Point-in-time recovery enabled. Running through the recovery process, we see it restores to a new table as opposed to restoring the original table in place.

With it restoring to a new table, is the idea that one would typically change the Lambda to point at the new table, or would one copy the new table over the original? Related: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/PointInTimeRecovery.html

profile picture
已提問 2 年前檢視次數 288 次
1 個回答
2
已接受的答案

It's not possible at this time to rename a table, so the best course of action will be to adjust the lambda to point at the new table, such as by retrieving the table name from a lambda environment variable or pulling it from a ParameterStore.

AWS
已回答 2 年前
profile picture
專家
已審閱 2 個月前

您尚未登入。 登入 去張貼答案。

一個好的回答可以清楚地回答問題並提供建設性的意見回饋,同時有助於提問者的專業成長。

回答問題指南