Amplify vs S3: Why is this behaviour different?

0

HI All, I'm still very much a novice with AWS and I'm following this tutorial to learn more Build a Serverless Web Application. In my own test account I've followed this tutorial without issue. I'm currently trying to apply the same tutorial in a restricted environment where I don't have access to Amplify. I figured I could get away with swapping Amplify in this tutorial S3, however I'm getting some odd behaviour.

I'm using this github repo website for both. I'm creating the bucket and uploading the files via TF.

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "mrw-example-bucket" {
  bucket = "mrw-example"

  tags = {
    Name = "mrw-example"
  }
}
resource "aws_s3_bucket_acl" "mrw-example-bucket-acl" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id
  acl    = "public-read"
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_website_configuration" "mrw-example-bucket-website-config" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id

  index_document {
    suffix = "index.html"
  }

  error_document {
    key = "error.html"
  }
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_public_access_block" "mrw-example-bucket-pab" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id

  block_public_acls   = false
  block_public_policy = false
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_policy" "mrw-example-bucket-policy" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id
  policy = file("policy.json")
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket_cors_configuration" "mrw-example-cors-config" {
  bucket = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id

  cors_rule {
    allowed_headers = ["*"]
    allowed_methods = ["PUT", "POST", "GET"]
    allowed_origins = ["*"]
    max_age_seconds = 3000
  }
}

###WEBSITE FILES###
locals {
  content_type_map = {
    html        = "text/html",
    js          = "application/javascript",
    css         = "text/css",
    svg         = "image/svg+xml",
    jpg         = "image/jpeg",
    ico         = "image/x-icon",
    png         = "image/png",
    gif         = "image/gif",
    pdf         = "application/pdf"
  }
}

resource "aws_s3_object" "mrw-example-bucket-objects" {
  for_each = fileset("website/", "**/*.*")
  bucket   = aws_s3_bucket.mrw-example-bucket.id
  key      = each.value
  source   = "website/${each.value}"
  etag     = filemd5("website/${each.value}")
  content_type  = lookup(local.content_type_map, regex("\\.(?P<extension>[A-Za-z0-9]+)$", each.value).extension, "application/octet-stream")
}

My question to you all, is why is the behaviour different? It feels like I've missed something obvious somewhere.

demandé il y a 2 ans296 vues
1 réponse
0
Réponse acceptée

Seems like caching issue. Cleared and resolved.

répondu il y a 2 ans

Vous n'êtes pas connecté. Se connecter pour publier une réponse.

Une bonne réponse répond clairement à la question, contient des commentaires constructifs et encourage le développement professionnel de la personne qui pose la question.

Instructions pour répondre aux questions