Environment variable to ProcessingJob in AWS Step function

0

I want to use pass variables to Sagemaker processsing job step in Step Functions.

This is the step function:

{
  "StartAt": "SageMaker CreateProcessingJob",
  "States": {
    "SageMaker CreateProcessingJob": {
      "Resource": "arn:aws:states:::sagemaker:createProcessingJob.sync",
      "Parameters": {
        "ProcessingResources": {
          "ClusterConfig": {
            "InstanceCount": 1,
            "InstanceType": "ml.m5.xlarge",
            "VolumeSizeInGB": 10
          }
        },
        "Environment": {
          "deviceENV": "retailWebplayer"
        },
        "AppSpecification": {
          "ImageUri": "<>.amazonaws.com/ecr-custom-image:latest",
          "ContainerEntrypoint": [
            "python3",
            "/opt/ml/processing/input/code/train-device-env.py"
          ]
        },
        "ProcessingInputs": [
          {
            "InputName": "code",
            "S3Input": {
              "S3Uri": "s3://<>/train-device-env.py",
              "LocalPath": "/opt/ml/processing/input/code",
              "S3DataType": "S3Prefix",
              "S3InputMode": "File",
              "S3DataDistributionType": "FullyReplicated",
              "S3CompressionType": "None"
            }
          }
        ],
        "StoppingCondition": {
          "MaxRuntimeInSeconds": 300
        },
        "RoleArn": "<>",
        "ProcessingJobName.$": "$$.Execution.Name"
      },
      "Type": "Task",
      "End": true
    }
  }
}

Is it better to use environment variables or parameters? Can we use parameters in this case and how?

Nessuna risposta

Accesso non effettuato. Accedi per postare una risposta.

Una buona risposta soddisfa chiaramente la domanda, fornisce un feedback costruttivo e incoraggia la crescita professionale del richiedente.

Linee guida per rispondere alle domande