Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

I tried to do Textract with one page pdf file using 1) Textract demo and 2) boto3 with sample code from here https://docs.aws.amazon.com/textract/latest/dg/examples-export-table-csv.html. However, the Textract demo gives better result than boto3. Why is that?

Martin Schade _AWS_
2 年前
Can you comment on what specifically works better in the Textract demo (assuming you refer to the AWS Console Textract experience). The Console shows merged cells, which in a CSV you won't see as merged cells are not supported.
Abduhoshim
2 个月前
I am also facing such situations while detecting tables and converting them into csv demo is doing great but boto3 has some problems

主题

机器学习和人工智能

标签

Amazon Textract 机器学习和人工智能

语言

English

aws-textract-user

已提问 2 年前426 查看次数

1 回答

最新
投票最多
评论最多

这些答案有用吗？为正确答案投票，以帮助社区从您的知识中受益。

Hi,

Please make sure you are using the same region when you are running Textract APIs. Also could you update your boto3 library using the following command: pip install --upgrade boto3

Thanks Ioan

Ioan

已回答 2 年前

Why Textract demo and boto3 Textract for Table give different result?

相关内容