1 Answer
- Newest
- Most votes
- Most comments
0
Two thoughts that may help here:
-
Why are they copying data from EFS to S3? If they are looking to save money on data that they aren't frequently accessing, they would likely be best served by EFS Infrequent Access, which transitions data not accessed for a configurable period of time to storage that is 85% lower price than EFS Standard.
-
Is the data size large (several GiB+), or does it need to be synchronized periodically? If so, and EFS IA isn't an appropriate solution, than AWS DataSync is likely your best choice. It is optimized for performance, so it will be the fastest way to move data between the two services. It can also be configured to run periodically, synchronizing deltas each time.
answered 5 years ago
Relevant content
- asked 2 years ago
- asked 2 years ago
- asked 8 months ago
- asked 2 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 3 months ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 2 years ago
- AWS OFFICIALUpdated 9 months ago